Difference between revisions of "Cisco CSR V1000 virtual router"
From Notes_Wiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Main Page|Home]] > [[Switch configuration notes]] > [[Cisco CSR V1000 virtual router]] | |||
'''This routers have been found to have very low throughput <2mbps with heavy packet loss during lab experiments. Better option is to use pfsense or Linux machine with firewalld / frr etc.'''. See appropriate sections of [[Configure NSX-T 3.0 from scratch with edge cluster and tier gateways]] for reference. | '''This routers have been found to have very low throughput <2mbps with heavy packet loss during lab experiments. Better option is to use pfsense or Linux machine with firewalld / frr etc.'''. See appropriate sections of [[Configure NSX-T 3.0 from scratch with edge cluster and tier gateways]] for reference. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
Any older and any newer images failed to deploy as ova or had some or other issue. | Any older and any newer images failed to deploy as ova or had some or other issue. | ||
[[Main Page|Home]] > [[Switch configuration notes]] > [[Cisco CSR V1000 virtual router]] | |||
Latest revision as of 06:08, 19 April 2022
Home > Switch configuration notes > Cisco CSR V1000 virtual router
This routers have been found to have very low throughput <2mbps with heavy packet loss during lab experiments. Better option is to use pfsense or Linux machine with firewalld / frr etc.. See appropriate sections of Configure NSX-T 3.0 from scratch with edge cluster and tier gateways for reference.
It is possible to use Cisco CSR V1000 routers on top of KVM / ESXi for some virtual lab / experiments. To do that it was found that below image seemed to boot and work properly:
- csr1000v-universalk9.03.11.02.S.154-1.S2-std-C1-M2560-N3-DS8
Any older and any newer images failed to deploy as ova or had some or other issue.
Home > Switch configuration notes > Cisco CSR V1000 virtual router
